生物医学工程学杂志

生物医学工程学杂志

盆底修复材料生物力学特征比较

查看全文

为探讨盆底修复材料的生物力学特征,本试验选取用于女性盆底重建手术的 4 种盆底修复材料,分别是全盆底修复系统(PROLIFT)、经闭孔无张力阴道悬吊系统(TVT-O)、经阴道悬吊置入系统(IVS)和脱细胞异体真皮基质医用组织补片(Renov)。将 4 种盆底修复材料分别在 Instron4302 万能材料试验机上进行拉伸力学试验,记录极限应力强度、弹性模量、最大负荷和最大伸长量。结果显示:4 种盆底修复材料的最大负荷依次为 TVT-O > IVS > PROLIFT > Renov,TVT-O 最大负荷显著高于 PROLIFT和Renov( P < 0.05);极限应力强度依次为 TVT-O > IVS > PROLIFT > Renov,但 4 种材料组间比较差异无统计学意义( P > 0.05);最大伸长量依次为 TVT-O > PROLIFT > IVS > Renov,TVT-O 和 PROLIFT 的最大伸长量均显著高于 Renov( P < 0.05);弹性模量依次为 IVS > Renov > TVT-O > PROLIFT,但 4 种材料组间比较差异无统计学意义( P > 0.05)。可见,4 种盆底修复材料中,IVS 的弹性模量最高;TVT-O 的力学强度最高;Renov 的最大负荷、极限应力强度以及最大伸长量均最低;PROLIFT 材料的力学性能最稳定,弹性模量最低,具有良好的延展性和弹性。因此,综合临床盆底重建手术的实际需要,在开发新型盆底修复材料时应注重其生物力学性能的考量。

This study aimed to investigate biomechanical properties of synthetic implants for reconstructive surgery of pelvic floor dysfunction. In this dissertation, we chose four synthetic implants, i.e. total pelvic floor repair system (PROLIFT), gynecone TVT obtutator system (TVT-O), intra-vaginal sling placement device (IVS) and acellular dermal matrix (Renov), for tensile test respectively. The biomechanical properties of four synthetic implants were measured and analyzed using a material testing machine (Instron 4302 versatile material testing machine). The biomechanical parameters included ultimate stress strength, modulus of elasticity, maximum load and maximum elongation. The results showed that the maximum load of the four symthetic implants was TVT-O > IVS > PROLIFT > Renov, and the maximum load of TVT-O was significantly higher than PROLIFT and Renov ( P < 0.05). The ultimate stress strength was TVT-O > IVS > PROLIFT > Renov, with no significant differences among them ( P > 0.05). The maximum elongation of the four implants was TVT-O > PROLIFT > IVS > Renov, and the maximum elongation of TVT-O and PROLIFT were both significantly higher than Renov ( P < 0.05). The modulus of elasticity was IVS > Renov > TVT-O > PROLIFT, with no significant differences among them ( P > 0.05). Taken together, the present study demonstrates that the modulus of elasticity of IVS was the highest in the four synthetic implants; TVT-O had the highest mechanical strength; The maximum load, ultimate stress strength and maximum elongation of Renov were all the lowest; The mechanical properties of PROLIFT was the most stable, and its modulus of elasticity was the lowest in the four synthetic implants, which had good extensibility and elasticity. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to the biomechanical properties of new pelvic reconstructive materials for the clinical pelvic reconstructive surgery.

关键词: 合成材料; 盆底修复; 生物力学; 极限应力强度; 弹性模量; 最大负荷; 最大伸长量

Key words: synthetic implants; reconstructive surgery of pelvic floor dysfunction; biomechanics; ultimate stress strength; modulus of elasticity; maximum load; maximum elongation

引用本文: 苗娅莉, 文继锐, 王世超, 赵志伟, 吴江. 盆底修复材料生物力学特征比较. 生物医学工程学杂志, 2018, 35(3): 409-414. doi: 10.7507/1001-5515.201707071 复制

登录后 ,请手动点击刷新查看全文内容。 没有账号,
登录后 ,请手动点击刷新查看图表内容。 没有账号,
1. Morgan J E. A sling operation, using Marlex polypropylene mesh, for treatment of recurrent stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1970, 106(3): 369-377.
2. Stanton S L, Brindley G S, Holmes D M. Silastic sling for urethral sphincter incompetence in women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1985, 92(7): 747-750.
3. Iosif C S. Abdominal sacral colpopexy with use of synthetic mesh. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 1993, 72(3): 214-217.
4. Cervigni M, Natale F. The use of synthetics in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Curr Opin Urol, 2001, 11(4): 429-435.
5. Ridgeway B, Chen C C, Paraiso M F. The use of synthetic mesh in pelvic reconstructive surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 51(1): 136-152.
6. Gibson L D, Stafford C E. Synthetic mesh repair of abdominal wall defects: follow up and reappraisal. Am Surg, 1964, 30(8): 481-486.
7. Acquaviva D E, Bourret P. Cure des éventrations par plaques de nylon. Press Med, 1948, 73: 892.
8. Cosson M, Debodinance P, Boukerrou M, et al. Mechanical properties of synthetic implants used in the repair of prolapse and urinary incontinence in women: which is the ideal material?. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 2003, 14(3): 169-178.
9. 苗娅莉, 呼春晖, 王建六, 等. 阴道后壁脱垂患者阴道后壁组织生物力学特征初步研究. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2008, 9(3): 180-183.
10. Dietz H P, Vancaillie P, Svehla M, et al. Mechanical properties of urogynecologic implant materials. Int Urogynecol J, 2003, 14(4): 239-243.
11. Goldberg R P, Koduri S, Sand P K, et al. The tensile strength of Cooper's ligament suturing: comparison of abdominal and transvaginal techniques. Int Urogynecol J, 2004, 15(6): 425-427; discussion 428.
12. Cosson M, Debodinance P, Boukerrou M, et al. Mechanical properties of synthetic implants used in the repair of prolapse and urinary incontinence in women: which is the ideal material?. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 2003, 14(3): 169-178; discussion 178.
13. Choe J M, Kothandapani R, James L, et al. Autologous, cadaveric, and synthetic materials used in sling surgery: comparative biomechanical analysis. Urology, 2001, 58(3): 482-486.
14. Sclafani A P, McCormick S A, Cocker R. Biophysical and microscopic analysis of homologous dermal and fascial materials for facial aesthetic and reconstructive uses. Arch Facial Plast Surg, 2002, 4(3): 164-171.
15. Clemons J L, Myers D L, Aguilar V C, et al. Vaginal paravaginal repair with an AlloDerm graft. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 189(6): 1612-1618; discussion 1618-1619.
16. Hilger W S, Walter A, Zobitz M E, et al. Histological and biomechanical evaluation of implanted graft materials in a rabbit vaginal and abdominal model. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 195(6): 1826-1831.
17. Mueller M G, Elborno D, Davé B A, et al. Postoperative appointments: which ones count?. Int Urogynecol J, 2016, 27(12): 1873-1877.
18. Unger C A, Abbott S, Evans J M, et al. Outcomes following treatment for pelvic floor mesh complications. Int Urogynecol J, 2014, 25(6): 745-749.
19. Abbott S, Unger C A, Evans J M, et al. Evaluation and management of complications from synthetic mesh after pelvic reconstructive surgery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 210(2): 163.e1-8.
20. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA safety communication: update on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh in repair of pelvic organ prolapsed [EB/OL]. (2011-07-13)[2017-07-26]. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm262435.htm.
21. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA public health notification: serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh in repair of pelvic organ prolapsed and stress urinary incontinence[EB/OL]. (2012-07-31)[2017-07-26]. http://www.fda.gov/Medical Devices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/PublicHealthNotifications/UCM061976.
22. Glazener C M, Breeman S, Elders A, et al. Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or posterior compartment prolapse surgery: two parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials (PROSPECT). Lancet, 2017, 389(10067): 381-392.